Which of the following statements is true regarding cyclic compounds?

Cyclic compounds are indeed capable of having substituents, and it is crucial to number these substituents correctly in their nomenclature. This ensures that the name of the compound reflects its structure accurately. When naming a cyclic compound with substituents, the substituents are indicated based on the position they occupy on the ring, which is typically numbered in a way that gives them the lowest possible numbers while following specific rules of nomenclature.

For instance, if a cyclic compound has multiple substituents, the numbering of the ring should prioritize the placement of these substituents for clarity, helping to differentiate between possible structural isomers. This is an essential aspect of organic chemistry nomenclature that reflects the compound's actual structure.

The incorrect options highlight misunderstandings about cyclic compounds: they can indeed have substituents, they are not always aromatic (as many cyclical compounds are aliphatic), and they have specific structural differences compared to acyclic compounds, particularly in how atoms are arranged and bonded in a closed loop versus an open chain.